Subdivided We
Stand
Whither
Are We Traveling?
Dwight L. Smith
Question 5: What can we expect when we have permitted
Freemasonry to become subdivided into a score of organizations?
Back in my newspaper days I used to get a great deal of unwholesome amusement
out of the power struggle between four church congregations in a town of less
than four hundred inhabitants. All four churches were of the same denominational
family and bore the same name. Each claimed to be the Real Thing. The membership
of each was convinced that all others were heretics, and, as such, were
condemned to eternal damnation.
What must a newly raised Master Mason who takes his Freemasonry seriously
think of our subdivisions? Are they just as baffling to him as the four churches
of the same name in a town of 400 were to me? Sometimes I wonder.
What must he think when he discovers that no less than 70 organizations have
attached themselves to our ancient brotherhood – and that the end is not in
sight? What is the reaction of the man who came into Freemasonry of his own free
will and accord when he finds that a subdivision can solicit him almost as soon
as he leaves the altar in the Entered Apprentice degree? And how does he feel
when his beloved Lodge is referred to as the “Blue Lodge” with a rather
patronizing air, and when the so-called “Blue Lodge Mason” is looked upon as
something inferior, as if his neck and ears were not quite clean?
If we are interested in exploring possible causes for a decline in membership
and for a slackening of interest and attendance, we had better look to our
subdivisions. Of course, he who introduces the subject invites bitter criticism,
but I stand firm on my conviction that in the United States we are spreading
ourselves so thin that the basic unit – the Ancient Craft Lodge – is the
loser. We may not end up by killing the goose that laid the golden egg, but
certainly we are bleeding her white.
Yes, I am a member of many of the subdivisions. All of them have contributed
much to my understanding and appreciation of Freemasonry, and I do not believe
any of them can question my loyalty. “It is not that I love Caesar less,
but that I love Rome more.”
And I am not the only one who is concerned, --not by a great deal.
Authorities by the dozen might be quoted. As long ago as 1924 the eminent
English Masonic student, Sir Alfred Robins, was writing that “this sponge-like
growth is spreading in American Masonry, and is threatening certain of the best
interests of the Craft.” One of the most forthright and statesmanlike
pronouncements comes from Brother Noah J. Frey, 33º, Scottish Rite Deputy for
Wisconsin, in an address before the Grand Lodge of Wisconsin in 1961.
“Sometimes,” he said, “I wish that Masonry were not as divisive as it is,
because we are all Blue Lodge members, and I fear that we lose sight of that
fact and divide ourselves into smaller groups and thereby increase our
inefficiency.”
And certainly Dr. Thomas S. Roy, Past Grand Master of Massachusetts, can not
be accused of hostility to any Masonic body, yet in an eloquent address before
the Conference of Grand Secretaries in North America in February, 1962, he was
forced to declare:
“If we permit the proliferation of Masonry into rites, and the 57 varieties
of bodies whose membership is dependant upon ours, let us face the fact that the
attendance that goes to them belongs to us. There is a sense in which it can be
said that their success is our failure. I am not passing judgment on any of
them. I am a good member in some f them, and have done my share of work in them.
But they all must face the fact that they must pour some of their strength back
into the Symbolic Lodge. For any weakness we develop must sooner or later
communicate itself to them.”
It is not basic loyalty that is at stake; it is not unity of purpose that we
lack. Nor can we gloss over our shortcomings with talk about money, and
benevolences, and good works. These are not the issues. We have never
faced the real issues, which are:
One: The weakening of the basic unit of Freemasonry by too great an
emphasis on our subdivisions, and,
Two: The unsound premise that the child is more important than the
parent.
Let’s stand before the mirror and take an honest look at ourselves.
1. Masonic bodies and appendant organizations are
actually competing for the time, the attendance, the interest, the substance,
the devotion of Master Masons. I am sick and tired of all the talk about TV,
and the automobile, and bowling leagues as competing influences. It is time we
look in our own house to see where the competition comes from.
Like the four churches of the same name, each Masonic organization poses as
the Real Thing. Each claims to have That Which Was Lost. Each is the true
wrinkle if we want to appear before the world as a Big Mason – one with a
collection of degrees, exclusive and affluent.
2. Our subdivisions have encouraged the
mental attitude that when a Master Mason gains membership in another body, he
then and there has outgrown the Ancient Craft Lodge.
Several months after I became a Mason I was solicited by a worker in one of
the recognized bodies. But I had mental reservations. “Why is it,” I asked
him, “that Masons who belong to the other bodies place such a stress on those
affiliations and seem to care so little about their Lodge?” Just what answer
he gave me I do not remember. Really, it doesn’t matter too much, for the
question never has been answered to my satisfaction. I held out for about three
years before I presented my petition.
Years later, when I received the degrees in another Masonic body, I overheard
a past presiding officer say, “Now here, in this body, you will find the Cream
of Masonry.” From that day to this, I have resented such artificial class
distinction.
The newspaper obituary in my files which states that the deceased “was a
member of 17 organizations, 10 of them Masonic groups,” and then proceeds to
list everything that could be bought with money, is a case in point. To be a
Master Mason was not enough; actually, that was of little or no importance.
And what about the Vanishing Emblem? What is wrong with the Square and
Compass? Even Grand Masters have discarded it. Is it no longer a badge of honor?
Must something else replace it to set the wearer apart and place him in the
aristocracy?
A young man of my acquaintance was interested in petitioning for the degrees.
He was interested, that is, until a Master Mason gave him the old Superiority
Sales Talk, something like this: “Sure, I’m a member of Brotherly Love
Lodge, but only because I have to be. The Blue Lodge, it doesn’t mean a thing
to me. What I’m after is what give me the prestige and helps me in my
business!”
And we wonder why attendance is poor, why interest is lax, why the membership
curve goes downward!
3. Then there are these subdivisions that
foster the attitude that, within their place of refuge, the standards of Ancient
Craft Masonry do not apply.
Therein lies a situation that is more than alarming; it is downright vicious.
Scarcely a Jurisdiction in the United States is free of headaches brought on by
some group restricting its membership to Masons, but considering itself exempt
from Masonic standards. A few Jurisdictions have met the issue head on, to the
good of all Freemasonry. Others have looked in the other direction, and thereby
have damaged the entire Fraternity.
One of these days Masonic leadership had better come to grips with the issue.
The winking attitude which says, in effect, “It’s none of our business as
long as you are not wearing an apron,” is unthinkingly dealing a body blow to
our beloved Craft. A serious minded young friend of mine expressed interest in
Masonry until a Past Master gave him a lurid description of the antics and the
carousals he enjoyed in his favorite appendant organization. That ended his
interest. Mark it down. The public makes no distinction between the Master
Mason who wears an apron and the Master Mason who wears some other kind of garb.
4. When the leadership of Ancient Craft Masonry
neglects the parent body to smile upon everything which claims a relationship to
Freemasonry, however remote, that leadership is not contributing to a solution
of our problem; it is
only aggravating it. In a single year, not so long ago, two American
Grand Masters actually visited more appendant bodies than Symbolic Lodges in
their respective terms of office.
From one end of America to the other, Grand Masters are going up and down
their jurisdictions like itinerate peddlers, promoting everything under the sun
except plain, unadulterated Symbolic Freemasonry. They go to Washington to
attend what used to be the Grand Masters’Conference and find that it has
become “Masonic Week” with the side-shows taking over. Truly, the tail has
begun to wag the dog. And we wonder what is wrong!
Subdivided we stand, and subdivided, I fear, we shall fall.
One does not have to be more than forty to remember when the superpatriots
raged over the hyphenated American, declaring it was time to drop Old World
loyalties and become an American without a hyphen.
Well, I am not advocating that hyphenated Masons eliminate anything that
contributes to their understanding and appreciation of Freemasonry. But I am
preaching a gospel of fundamentals. I am calling on our Symbolic Lodges to do a
better job of upgrading themselves. And I am challenging the other Masonic
organizations and appendant groups to put a stop to the down-grading of the
Symbolic Lodge; to acknowledge by actions, rather than words, that the Lodge is
the fountainhead of all Freemasonry; to put first things first; to look unto the
rock whence they are hewn
back to top |