"That excellent key, a Freemason's tongue which should speak well of a
Brother, absent or present, but when unfortunately that cannot be done
with honour, and propriety, should adopt that excellent virtue of the
Craft, which is Silence."
The above paragraph constitutes the charge at the end of the first
section of the First Lecture and inculcates a lesson which is particularly
needed in a Society such as Freemasonry. A group of men constantly meeting
together are only too prone to indulge in idle chatter and mild
scandal-mongering. It is not necessary to assume that when Bro. A relates
to Brother B the latest stories he has heard about Bro. C he is actuated
by malice. As likely as not he is merely passing the time between lodge
and refreshment, and hardly realises that he may be doing a real injury
to a brother by passing on some tale which reflects no credit on the
victim. It is clear that the reorganisers of Freemasonry in the 18th
century realised how easy it was for petty scandals to pass from month to
mouth, to the detriment of real brotherly affection, for there is little
doubt that the moral lesson that you should speak well of a brother or
else remain silent is dramatically taught on two occasions during the
ceremony.
Soon after his entrance into Lodge the candidate is led to two of the
chief Officers, and is only allowed to pass when each Officer in turn is
satisfied that the tongue of good report has spoken in his favour. Here at
once we have an important hint of this precept, for seeing that the
candidate only gained admission because no one spoke unkindly of his past
career, he should remember this fact and not speak unkindly of other
brethren. If there were any doubt on this point, the similar testing which
takes place towards the end of the ceremony would remove it. Therein the
candidate is with much elaboration taught the important lesson of Caution;
ostensibly it is caution with regard to Masonic secrets, but though, no
doubt, it has this object in view, there is hardly an incident in
Freemasonry which does not teach more than one lesson at the same time.
Let us then consider what is meant by the secrets of Freemasonry.
Obviously, they are something more important than a few test "words and
signs whose chief utility, apparently, is to enable brethren to recognise
each other. There would be no use in having such signs unless Freemasonry
itself contained some hidden secrets which these guarded, and we do know
that hidden in her symbolism, particularly in the second and third
degrees, is a system of mystical teaching and possibly, even, a certain
amount of occult training.
But in the first degree we perceive that the main object of the
ceremony is moral training, notwithstanding the fact that there are also
mystical secrets hidden therein. From the standpoint of moral training,
why then this emphasis on the necessity for silence and secrecy, and why
should the first section of the Lectures close on this note ?
The explanation is surely that Masonry aims at developing Brotherly
Love and in order that this may be achieved one of the first essentials is
confidence in each other. If one brother finds that another has been
passing on unkind remarks about him, the fact is sufficient to mar the
harmony of the lodge and destroy mutual confidence. It is not merely that
a trifling incident passed by word of mouth from man to man tends to be
distorted and exaggerated, although this is a fact which cannot be denied,
but ev en more that as brothers we ought to avoid doing anything which may
harm another's reputation or hurt his feelings. At a later date the
Candidate definitely promises to keep a brother's lawful secrets, but even
thus early in his career the importance of caution and silence when
dealing with the affairs of others is impressed upon his mind. Is it not a
golden rule that when we cannot speak well of a brother we should at least
remain silent ? There may be exceptions to this rule, occasions when we
must protest against a certain line of conduct, but these are far fewer
than at first sight one may be inclined to think. Moreover, in a higher
degree the duty, if needs be, of reproving a brother is recognised, but
that instruction is not given to an E.A., who is only at the beginning of
his masonic career and is in the position of a junior among seniors.
It should be noted, however, that while there may be good reasons for
reproving a brother to his face, there are none for telling tales about
him behind his back, and the very school boy's code which lays it down
that one must not sneak shows that Masonry is not unique in stressing the
fact that we should speak well of a brother absent or present, but when
that is unfortunately impossible should adopt that excellent virtue of the
Craft, which is silence. If this were always done much bitterness and
bickering which at present disfigures the social life of the world would
automatically vanish.